Jean Gebser and Dane Rudhyar
Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 01:57AM In this short essay I will account for what looks like evolution when viewed from the Mental epoch of human history, and what looks like devolution when viewed from the Mythical epoch . By way of beginning our discussion I will assume that a movement towards freedom and novelty are inherent to the world. Alfred North Whitehead calls this foundational abstraction Creativity and defines it as the process whereby the many become one and are increased by one (1978, p. 21). After some careful comparison I have come to see Dane Rudhyar's process-oriented triptych model of consciousness as a description of a similar, if not identical, process. Rudhyar tells us that novelty is introduced and embodied in the world by a triptych process of involution, devolution, and evolution. His definition and use of these terms can bring a considerable amount of clarity to Gebser's mutations of consciousness. Before clarifying this point, I will spend some time defining these terms. I will rely heavily on Whitehead's own terminology to do this . I will also assume that the reader has a working knowledge of these terms, so as not to have to define each of them as I go.
